MENU
Home
Books & DVDs
Liberty Quotes
Links
Blog
|
by L.K. Samuels, April 3, 2007
March 19 marked
the fourth anniversary of the invasion of Iraq by U.S. forces. Across
California and the United States, thousands of demonstrators mourned this
event with peace rallies, funeral marches, and speeches. Like many
concerned citizens, I organized and participated in several peace rallies
in the Monterey area. These rallies represented a wide coalition
of groups and ideas, ranging from labor activists, Democrats, Quakers,
and United Nations associations to libertarians. But when I delved
deeper into why my fellow peace activists were protesting, I discovered
that they know little about the causes of war.
The war in
Iraq is no different from most wars, except that it has striking similarities
to the Napoleonic
wars. Fought across continental Europe in the early 1800s, these
series of wars were allegedly fought to liberate the people from their
oppressors. Napoleon repeatedly cited his intentions to replace kings
and the nobility with liberty, equality, and fraternity. There was
only one problem. The people in adjacent foreign lands did not want
to be liberated and referred to the invading Napoleon as the bogeyman.
The only revolutionary idea that Napoleon gave to Europe was adding propaganda
to the arsenal of war.
The Bush administration
is chanting the same mantra in Iraq, arguing that American troops are there
to secure a stable democracy. Like Napoleon's forces, American troops
are involved in nation-building to "liberate" the Iraqis and provide them
with the tools of democracy, even though Iraq has never had a democratic
government in its 7,000-year history, or possessed any grassroot movements
advancing the concept of liberty.
So what is
the root cause of war? Some sociologists point to the authoritarian
attitudes of those who believe they are right, everyone else is wrong,
and everyone must do as they command. This rigid mindset of one's
own moral superiority permits ruling systems to engage in armed conflicts
around the world and to commit all sorts of atrocities. Of course,
any resulting collateral damage is considered acceptable because the war
is being waged for a good cause.
Most wars are
an affront to individual rights. When the few can command the many
to do their murderous bidding, small conflicts tend to magnify into large
ones. The concentration of power provides authorities with the collective
means to execute their do-good pet policies. That is because most
world leaders have succumbed to the Machiavellian notion that "the ends
justify the means," contending that any violent act -- murder, robbery,
and so forth -- is permissible providing that the end goal is a "greater
good." And under this greater-good nostrum, the public often accepts
the government's argument that war
is peace, that freedom
is slavery, and that invading a foreign nation with a preemptive strike
is a defense maneuver.
As Randolph
Bourne wrote in 1918, "War
is the health of the state." Government thrives off war and the
hysteria it spawns. Without such conflicts, the authorities could
not justify increased spying on citizens and suspension of citizens' rights.
Government needs war the way a heroin addict needs drugs. They need
it to justify increasing taxes and expanding debt and to inflame nationalistic
fervor. Governments need foreign devils and unstable conditions to
prop up sagging popularity and economic policies. Even Thomas Paine
recognized this truism in The
Rights of Man, writing that "taxes were not raised to carry on wars,
but that wars were raised to carry on taxes."
But the true
culprit for war is a staunch belief in the infallibility of governmental
power. To accept the legitimacy of the state is to embrace the necessity
for war. For thousands of years, governments have been the quintessential
war machine. If given the means, they tirelessly prepare for armed
conflict with foreign and domestic opponents. They seek to protect
their status, their authority, and their right to rule over others, creating
an US versus THEM environment.
Conflict and
war are the greatest threat to human liberty, life, and property.
And a policy of perpetual war and nation-building eventually turns peaceful
republics into violent empires.
The best road
to peace is to allow citizens to structure their own lives as they see
fit. When citizens are denied freedom, conflict flares and war is
not far behind. Only a small, unobtrusive government can reduce intrasocietal
and foreign conflict. Only an open society, in which citizens freely
choose their own personal and economic lifestyles, can ensure a peaceful
way of life.
_________________________________________________
Please leave your comments on our message
board.
|